Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics

(Some reference links may require a separate subscription.)

1. A. Newell, Unified Theories of Cognition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990).
2. F. Reif, Teaching problem solving—A scientific approach, Phys. Teach. 19, 310 (1981) [SPIN]; ; J. H. Larkin and F. Reif, Understanding and teaching problem solving in physics, Eur. J. Sci. Educ. 1, 191 (1979).
3. D. Maloney, Research in problem solving: Physics, in Handbook of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Science, edited by D. Gabel (MacMillan, London, 1994).
4. J. Touger, R. Dufresne, W. Gerace, P. T. Hardiman, and J. Mestre, How novice physics students deal with explanations, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 17, 255 (1995); ; J. P. Mestre, R. Dufresne, W. J. Gerace, P. T. Hardiman, and J. S. Touger, Promoting skilled problem solving behavior among beginning physics students, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30, 303 (1993).
5. A. Van Heuvelen, Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research based instructional strategies, Am. J. Phys. 59, 891 (1991) [SPIN][INSPEC]; ; Overview case study physics,, 898 (1991) [CrossRef][SPIN][INSPEC].
6. M. Chi, R. Glaser, and E. Rees, Expertise in problem solving. in Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, edited by R. J. Sternberg (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1982), Vol. 1, pp. 7–75.
7. A. H. Schoenfeld, Mathematical Problem Solving (Academic, New York, 1985); ; A. H. Schoenfeld, Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics, in Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by D. Grouws (McMillan, New York, 1992), Chap. 15, pp. 334–370; ; A. H. Schoenfeld, Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving, in Toward the Thinking Curriculum: Current Cognitive Research, edited by L. B. Resnick and B. L. Klopfer (ASCD, Washington, DC, 1989), pp. 83–103; ; A. Schoenfeld and D. J. Herrmann, Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert novice mathematical problem solvers, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 8, 484 (1982).
8. P. T. Hardiman, R. Dufresne, and J. P. Mestre, The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among novices and experts, Mem. Cognit. 17, 627 (1989) [CAS].
9. M. T. H. Chi, P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser, Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices, Cogn. Sci. 5, 121 (1981).
10. T. de Jong and M. G. M. Ferguson-Hessler, Cognitive structure of good and poor problem solvers in physics, J. Educ. Psychol. 78, 279 (1986).
11. J. Larkin, J. McDermott, D. Simon, and H. Simon, Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems, Science 208, 1335 (1980) [ADS]; ; J. Larkin, Understanding, problem representations, and skills in physics, in Thinking and Learning Skills, edited by S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, and R. Glaser (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1985), Vol. 2, pp. 141–159; ; J. Larkin, Cognition of learning physics, Am. J. Phys. 49, 534 (1981) [SPIN].
12. C. Singh, When physical intuition fails, Am. J. Phys. 70, 1103 (2002) [SPIN][INSPEC].
13. P. W. Cheng and K. J. Holyoak, Pragmatic reasoning schemas, Cogn. Psychol. 17, 391 (1985) [CAS]; ; P. Johnson-Laird, Psychology of Reasoning, Structure and Content (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1972).
14. J. J. Kaput, Representation and problem solving: Methodological issues related to modeling, in Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives, edited by E. A. Silver (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1985), pp. 381–398.
15. J. Zhang, The nature of external representations in problem solving, Cogn. Sci. 21, 179 (1997).
16. G. Hatano and K. Inagaki, Two courses in expertise, in Child Development and Education in Japan, edited by H. Stevenson, J. Azuma, and K. Hakuta (W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 1986), pp. 262–272.
17. H. A. Simon and J. R. Hayes, The understanding process: Problem isomorphs, Cogn. Psychol. 8, 165 (1976); ; J. R. Hayes, H. A. Simon, Psychological differences among problem isomorphs, in Cognitive Theory, edited by N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, and G. R. Potts (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977).
18. K. Kotovsky, J. R. Hayes, and H. A. Simon, Why are some problems hard? Evidence from the Tower of Hanoi, Cogn. Psychol. 17, 248 (1985).
19. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999).
20. R. Bjork and A. Richardson-Klavhen, On the puzzling relationship between environment, context and human memory, in Current Issues in Cognitive Processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition, edited by C. Izawa (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989).
21. D. Godden and A. Braddeley, Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and under water, Br. J. Psychol. 66, 325 (1975).
22. S. K. Reed, G. W. Ernst, and R. Bannerji, The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states, Cogn. Psychol. 6, 436 (1974).
23. E. Saltiel and J. L. Malgrange, ‘Spontaneous’ ways of reasoning in elementary kinematics, Eur. J. Phys. 1, 73 (1980).
24. J. Larkin, The role of problem representation in physics, in Mental Models, edited by D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983), pp. 75–98.
25. J. Smith, A. diSessa, and J. Rochelle, Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition, J. Learn. Sci. 3, 115 (1994).
26. C. Singh, Exploration Center for large introductory physics courses, Phys. Teach. 38 (3), 189 (2000) [SPIN].
27. J. Sweller, Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cogn. Sci. 12, 257 (1988); ; J. Sweller, R. Mawer, and M. Ward, Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 112, 639 (1983).