Scientific abilities and their assessment

(Some reference links may require a separate subscription.)

1. R. Czujko, in The Changing Role of Physics Departments in Modern Universities, edited by E. F. Redish and J. S. Rigden, AIP Conf. Proc., No. 399 (AIP, New York, 1997), pp. 213–224.
2. What Work Requires of Schools: A SCANS Report for America 2000 (U. S. Department of Labor, Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, Washington D.C., 1991).
3. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1999).
4. A. Carneval, L. Gainer, and A. Meltzer, Workplace Basics: The Essential Skills Employers Want (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1990).
5. See the ABET home page at URL http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml.
6. National Research Council, National Science Education Standards (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1996).
7. L. C. McDermott & the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington, Physics by Inquiry (Wiley, New York, 1996).
8. E. F. Redish, Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite (Wiley, New York, 2003).
9. D. R. Sokoloff and R. K. Thornton, Interactive Lecture Demonstrations (Wiley, New York, 2004).
10. D. R. Sokoloff, R. K. Thornton, and P. W. Laws, RealTime Physics (Wiley, New York, 2004).
11. P. W. Laws, Workshop Physics Activity Guide, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2004).
12. L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice Hall, New York, 1998).
13. See the SCALE-UP project webpage at URL http://www.ncsu.edu/per/scaleup.html.
14. H. Kruglak, Am. J. Phys. 20, 136 (1952).
15. H. Kruglak, Am. J. Phys. 22, 442 (1954).
16. H. Kruglak, Am. J. Phys. 22, 452 (1954).
17. H. Kruglak, Am. J. Phys. 23, 82 (1955).
18. National Assessment Governing Board, Science Framework for the 2005 National Assessment of Education Progress (US Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2004), URL http://www.nagb.org/pubs/s_framwork_05/761907-ScienceFramewo%rk.pdf.
19. P. Gonzales, C. Calsyn, L. Jocelyn, K. Mak, D. Kastberg, S. Arafeh, T. Williams, and W. Tsen, Statistical Analysis Report No. NCES 2001-028 2001 (unpublished).
20. G. Salomon and D. N. Perkins, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 24, 113 (1989).
21. S. Holton and S. Brush, Physics, The Human Adventure (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2001).
22. A. E. Lawson, Am. Bio. Teach. 62, 482 (2000).
23. A. E. Lawson, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25, 1387 (2003).
24. B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I Cognitive Domain (David McKay Co, Inc., New York, 1956).
25. P. Dressel and L. Mayer, General Education: Exploration in Evaluation. Final Report of the Cooperative Study of Evaluation in General Education (Council on Education, Washington, DC, 1954).
26. C. D. Schunn and J. Anderson, in Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom and Professional Settings, edited by K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, and T. Okada (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2001), pp. 351–392.
27. P. Black and D. Wiliam, Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment (nferNelson, London, 1998).
28. D. R. Sadler, Instr. Sci. 18, 119 (1989).
29. S. M. Brookhart, The Art and Science of Classroom Assessment: The Missing Part of Pedagogy, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Washington, DC, 1999) Vol. 27, No.1.
30. R. D. Tweney, in Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom and Professional Settings, edited by K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, and T. Okada (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2001), pp. 141–173.
31. D. Hestenes, Am. J. Phys. 55, 440 (1987) [SPIN][INSPEC][ADS].
32. J. A. Kournay, Scientific Knowledge: Basic Issues in the Philosophy of Science (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1987).
33. E. Nagel, The Structure of Science (Harcourt, Brace, & World, Inc., New York, 1961).
34. A. E. Lawson, Sci. Educ. 9, 577 (2000).
35. E. Etkina, A. A. Warren, and M. Gentile, Phys. Teach. 44, 34 (2006) [SPIN].
36. C. A. Chinn and W. F. Brewer, Rev. Educ. Res. 63, 1 (1993).
37. M. Lawrence, Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 1997.
38. R. H. Horwood, Sci. Educ. 72, 41 (1988).
39. E. Etkina, A. Van Heuvelen, D. T. Brookes, and D. Mills, Phys. Teach. 40, 351 (2002) [SPIN].
40. L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, & Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Longman, New York, 2001).
41. A. Van Heuvelen, Am. J. Phys. 59, 891 (1991) [SPIN][INSPEC].
42. D. Rosengrant, A. Van Heuvelen, and E. Etkina, in Proceedings of the 2005 Physics Education Research Conference, edited by P. Heron, J. Marx, and L. McCullough, AIP Conference Proc. No. 818 (AIP, New York, 2006), pp. 49–52.
43. S. Murthy and E. Etkina, in Proceedings of the 2004 Physics Education Research Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 720 (AIP, NY, 2005), pp. 133–137.
44. S. Murthy and E. Etkina, Using rubrics as self-assessment instruments for students in introductory laboratories, AAPT National Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, January, 2005.
45. A. Buffler, S. Allie, F. Lubben, and B. Campbell, Int. J. Sci. Educ. 23, 1137 (2001).
46. R. Lippmann, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 2003.
47. S. M. Barnett and S. J. Ceci, Sankhya, Ser. A 128, 612 (2002).
48. M. L. Gick and K. J. Holyoak, Cogn. Sci. 12, 306 (1980).
49. Study reported in A. Van Heuvelen, Implementing a science process approach in large introductory physics courses, talk given at Rutgers University, November, 2004.