Student representational competence and self-assessment when solving physics problems

(Some reference links may require a separate subscription.)

1. K. R. Koedinger and M. J. Nathan, J. Learn. Sci. 13, 129 (2004).
2. N. Finkelstein, W. K. Adams, C. J. Keller, P. B. Kohl, K. K. Perkins, N. S. Podolefsky, S. Reid, and R. LeMaster, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010103 (2005).
3. D. E. Meltzer, Am. J. Phys. 73, 463 (2005) [SPIN].
4. A. Van Heuvelen and X. Zou, Am. J. Phys. 69, 184 (2001) [SPIN][INSPEC].
5. A. Van Heuvelen, Am. J. Phys. 59, 891 (1991) [SPIN][INSPEC].
6. R. J. Dufresne, W. J. Gerace, and W. J. Leonard, Phys. Teach. 35, 270 (1997) [SPIN].
7. R. J. Beichner, Am. J. Phys. 62, 750 (1994) [SPIN][INSPEC].
8. F. M. Goldberg and J. H. Anderson, Phys. Teach. 27, 254 (1989) [SPIN].
9. L. C. McDermott, M. L. Rosenquist, and E. H. Van Zee, Am. J. Phys. 55, 503 (1987) [SPIN][INSPEC].
10. S. E. Ainsworth, P. A. Bibby, and D. J. Wood, in Learning with Multiple Representations, edited by M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. Boshuizen, and Ton de Jong (Pergamon, New York, 1998).
11. R. E. Mayer, Learn. Instr. 13, 125 (2003).
12. W. Schnotz and M. Bannert, Learn. Instr. 13, 141 (2003).
13. R. B. Kozma and J. Russell, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 34, 949 (1997).
14. P. Heller, R. Keith, and S. Anderson, Am. J. Phys. 60, 627 (1992) [SPIN][INSPEC].
15. It is also worth noting that the boundaries between representational categories can be fuzzy. For example, pictorial representations may not have a distinct boundary from graphical representations; however, for this paper, we draw distinct boundaries. We delineate graphical as a representation that includes an independent axis (generally numerical), and a dependent quantity (generally these are Cartesian in nature). We classify pictorial as a literal or iconic depiction of an observable event, or model.
16. A. A. diSessa and B. L. Sherin, J. Math. Behav. 19, 385 (2000).
17. A. A. diSessa, D. Hammer, B. L. Sherin, and T. Kolpakowski, J. Math. Behav. 10, 117 (1991).
18. A. A. diSessa, in Symbolizing, Modeling and Tool Use in Mathematics Education, edited by K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, and L. Vershaffel (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003).
19. http://www.lon-capa.org.
20. M. Chi, T. H. Glaser, and E. Rees, in Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, edited by R. J. Sternberg (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1982), Vol. 1.
21. E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996).
22. E. F. Redish, Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite (Wiley, New York, 2003).
23. M. Ward and J. Sweller, Cogn. Instruct. 7, 1 (1990).
24. A. Schoenfeld, in Cognitive Science and Math Education, edited by A. Schoenfeld (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987).