Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 4, 020105 (2008) [14 pages]

Plasticity of intermediate mechanics students’ coordinate system choice

Abstract
No Citing Articles
Download: PDF (238 kB) Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Eleanor C. Sayre
Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA

Michael C. Wittmann
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Education and Human Development and Center for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469-5709, USA

Received 15 March 2007; published 12 November 2008

We investigate the interplay between mathematics and physics resources in intermediate mechanics students. In the mechanics course, the selection and application of coordinate systems is a consistent thread. At the University of Maine, students often start the course with a strong preference to use Cartesian coordinates, in accordance with their prior physics and mathematics classes. In small-group interviews and in homework help sessions, we ask students to define a coordinate system and set up the equations of motion for a simple pendulum for which polar coordinates are more appropriate. We analyze video data from several encounters using a combination of Process/Object theory and Resource Theory. We find that students sometimes persist in using an inappropriate Cartesian system. Furthermore, students often derive (rather than recall) the details of the polar coordinate system, indicating that their knowledge is far from solid. To describe our work more precisely, we define a scale of plasticity and several heuristics for defining resources and their plasticity.


©2008 The American Physical Society

URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.020105
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.020105
PACS: 01.30.lb, 01.40.Fk, 01.40.Ha

Supplemental Material

Appendix [ pdf (80 kB) ]
Transcript of two interviews described in the main paper.

[ Abstract  |  Previous article  |  Next article  |  Issue 2 ]