Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010102 (2005) [9 pages]Student understanding of rotational and rolling motion concepts |
PRL Celebrates 50 Years
This Week's Milestone Letters are from 1981: |
Lorenzo G. Rimoldini and Chandralekha Singh *
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Received 25 May 2005; published 4 October 2005
We investigated the common difficulties that students have with concepts related to rotational and rolling motion covered in the introductory physics courses. We compared the performance of calculus- and algebra-based introductory physics students with physics juniors who had learned rotational and rolling motion concepts in an intermediate level mechanics course. Interviews were conducted with six physics juniors and ten introductory students using demonstration-based tasks. We also administered free-response and multiple-choice questions to a large number of students enrolled in introductory physics courses, and interviewed six additional introductory students on the test questions (during the test design phase). All students showed similar difficulties regardless of their background, and higher mathematical sophistication did not seem to help acquire a deeper understanding. We found that some difficulties were due to related difficulties with linear motion, while others were tied specifically to the more intricate nature of rotational and rolling motion.
©2005 The American Physical Society
URL: http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRSTPER/v1/e010102
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010102
PACS: 01.40.Fk
* Electronic address: clsingh@pitt.edu
Supplemental Material
| ||||
[ Abstract | Previous article | Next article | Issue 1 ]


